This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

J. Garrott Allen, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1971;102(2):122-126.

Abstract
Unless a strong federally licensed blood program is devised to provide quality blood, the risks of contracting posttransfusional hepatitis will continue to increase. Health programs that replace volunteer blood with commercial blood whose donors often have been Skid Row inhabitants, hippie drug addicts, and prisoners add to the problem. The life of the volunteer programs is threatened by this intermixing of commercial and volunteer blood. Since the nation's needs would be met if 7% of the eligible population contributed each year, an all volunteer program would solve the problem. Until a reliable test for potentially infectious blood is established, the best screening device is the knowledge of whether the donor was paid. Every physician using blood, especially the surgeon, should request blood from a volunteer donor until an effective test is available.

Author Affiliations
Stanford, Calif

From the Department of Surgery, Stanford (Calif) University Medical Center.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Sept 29, 1970.

Read before the 50th annual Coller-Penberthy-Thirlby Medical Conference, Traverse City Mich, July 30, 1970.

Reprint requests to Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif 94305 (Dr. Allen).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?