This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (2)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Robert L. Kerry, MD; Verne L. Hoshal, MD; Javier A. Ruiz, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1971;102(4):248-250.

Abstract
This is a comparative clinical and experimental study using the conventional nasogastric tube for five postoperative days after pyloroplasty and vagotomy and a method of tubeless decompression relying on the presence of gastric and intestinal motility and postural mechanical drainage. The study revealed the significant value of the "tubeless" method, including an appreciably lower incidence of complications, earlier ambulation, less patient discomfort, fewer postoperative laboratory studies, and an average three days shorter stay in the hospital. The "routine" use of the nasogastric tube is to be condemned for uncomplicated cases, being reserved for cases of obvious gastric outlet obstruction, bleeding and perforated ulcers.

Author Affiliations
Ann Arbor, Mich

From the Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, Mich.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Dec 15, 1970.

Read before the 78th annual meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Colorado Springs, Colo, Nov 19, 1970.

Reprint requests to St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor. Mich 48104 (Dr. Kerry).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?