You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 104 No. 2, February 1972 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  A SYMPOSIUM ON DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES IN PHLEBOTHROMBOSIS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (41)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Impedance Measurement in the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis

Jan R. Dmochowski, MD; Douglass F. Adams, MD; Nathan P. Couch, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1972;104(2):170-173.


Abstract

Impedance measurements were conducted on 50 limbs of 25 normal subjects, and on 43 limbs of 24 patients with clinical suspicion of deep venous thrombosis. On all patients, the impedance studies were followed by a phlebogram. Thirty-four out of 50 normal limbs showed a reduction of impedance during deep inspiration of more than 0.2%. The remaining 16 limbs demonstrated an impedance deflection of less than 0.2%. In patients, there were six false positive results, and one false negative result. Using the method described, it was concluded that the overall accuracy of impedance testing for diagnosing presence or absence of recent clots was 53.5%. Nevertheless, impedance measurement is a useful screening procedure for detection of deep thrombophlebitic disease of the lower extremity if its limitations are taken into account, primarily because of the very low rate of "false negative" results.



Author Affiliations

Boston

From the departments of surgery (Drs. Dmochowski and Couch) and radiology (Dr. Adams), Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept 2, 1971.

Reprint requests to 721 Huntington Ave, Boston 02115 (Dr. Dmochowski).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Meta-analysis of plethysmography and rheography in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.
Locker et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2006;23:630-635.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Noninvasive venous investigation
Smith
Vasc Med 1990;1:139-166.
 

Prevention and Treatment of Early Postoperative Deep Vein Thrombosis in Africans: A Nigerian Experience with Dihydroergotamine Mesylate
Ofoegbu and Osime
ANGIOLOGY 1981;32:812-818.
ABSTRACT  

Thrombophlebitis: Diagnostic Techniques
Painter
ANGIOLOGY 1980;31:386-397.
ABSTRACT  

Noninvasive Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis by Phleborheography
BYNUM et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1978;89:162-166.
ABSTRACT  

Invasive and Noninvasive Techniques in the Detection and Evaluation of Acute Venous Thrombosis
Strandness
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1977;11:205-215.
 

Physiological Testing in Clinical Angiology
Rouen
ANGIOLOGY 1976;27:57-64.
 

125I-Fibrinogen Uptake and Bilateral Impedance Rheography: Diagnosis of Postoperative Venous Thrombosis
Gazzaniga et al.
Arch Surg 1974;108:66-68.
ABSTRACT  

Impedance Testing for Venous Thrombosis
WHEELER
Arch Surg 1973;106:762-763.
ABSTRACT  

Bilateral Impedance Rheography in Deep Venous Thrombosis: Role of Respiratory Maneuvers and Saphenous Occlusion
Gazzaniga et al.
Arch Surg 1973;106:835-837.
ABSTRACT  

Limitations of Impedance Phlebography for Diagnosis of Venous Thrombosis
Steer et al.
Arch Surg 1973;106:44-48.
ABSTRACT  

Positional Factors in Venous Impedance Plethysmography
Deuvaert et al.
Arch Surg 1973;106:53-55.
ABSTRACT  

Impedance Phlebography: Technique, Interpretation, and Results
Wheeler et al.
Arch Surg 1972;104:164-169.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1972 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.