You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 104 No. 4, April 1972 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE SEVENTY-NINTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, PORTLAND, ORE, NOV 17-20, 1971
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Importance of Six Common Bacteria in Intestinal Strangulation

Charles E. Yale, MD, DSc; Edward Balish, PhD

AMA Arch Surg. 1972;104(4):438-442.


Abstract

The effects of monocontamination by each of six common intestinal bacteria were studied in germ-free rats with ischemic or hemorrhagic strangulation of closed intestinal segments. Six groups of 30 germfree rats were monocontaminated, each group with a single strain of one of the microorganisms. We found that (a) Bacteroides fragilis, Streptococcus faecalis, and Lactobacillus acidophilus were innocuous; (b) Staphylococcus aureus 80/81 killed only 17% of the animals; (c) Proteus vulgaris and Pseudomonas aeruginosa killed over 90% of the animals within 36 hours after strangulation; and (d) monocontamination and operation without strangulation was well tolerated by most of the animals except those associated with Ps aeruginosa. We concluded that the common intestinal bacteria vary greatly in their ability to cause death after intestinal strangulation.



Author Affiliations

Madison, Wis

From the departments of surgery (Drs. Yale and Balish) and medical microbiology (Dr. Balish), University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Dec 7, 1971.

Read before the 79th annual meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Portland, Ore, Nov 18, 1971.

Reprint requests to the Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Medical Center, 1300 University Ave, Madison, Wis 53706 (Dr. Yale).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The struggle for iron: gastrointestinal microbes modulate the host immune response during infection
Markel et al.
J. Leukoc. Biol. 2007;81:393-400.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recognition of intestinal epithelial HIF-1{alpha} activation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Patel et al.
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2007;292:G134-G142.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intestinal Strangulation in Germfree and Monocontaminated Dogs
Yale and Balish
Arch Surg 1979;114:445-448.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1972 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.