You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 105 No. 2, August 1972 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE TWENTY-NINTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE CENTRAL SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, CHICAGO, MARCH 2-4, 1972
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (42)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Amylase in the Management of Pancreatic Trauma

Palmer H. White, MD; John R. Benfield, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1972;105(2):158-163.


Abstract

Serum and urinary amylase values from 63 patients with pancreatic injuries were reviewed and correlated with clinical data. Forty-three patients were treated with débridement and drainage, 15 with distal pancreatectomy, and five with pancreatoduodenectomy. All of the latter survived. Of the 63 patients, six suffered injuries to other major structures and died.

Serum amylase levels were elevated preoperatively in only 26% of the patients; postoperatively, they were routinely normal. Urinary amylase (diastase) levels were elevated in 93% of the patients immediately after operation and were the best indicator of postoperative pancreatitis. When nasogastric suction was discontinued on clinical grounds in the face of an elevated diastase level, 11 of 14 patients developed recurrent signs of pancreatitis.

In patients with pancreatic injury, postoperative hyperamylasuria is an important indication for continued intensive therapy, including nasogastric suction even in asymptomatic patients.



Author Affiliations

Los Angeles

From the Department of Surgery, Harbor General Hospital, Torrance, Calif, and UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 7, 1972.

Read before the 29th annual meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Chicago, March 2, 1972.

Reprint requests to Harbor General Hospital, 1000 W Carson St, Torrance Calif 90509 (Dr. Benfield).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Diagnosis and Classification of Pancreatic and Duodenal Injuries in Emergency Radiology1
Linsenmaier et al.
RadioGraphics 2008;28:1591-1602.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreatic Injuries: An Analysis of Management Principles
Wisner et al.
Arch Surg 1990;125:1109-1113.
ABSTRACT  

Pancreatic Transection: A Concept of Evolving Injury
Horst and Bivins
Arch Surg 1989;124:1093-1095.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1972 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.