You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 105 No. 2, August 1972 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE TWENTY-NINTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE CENTRAL SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, CHICAGO, MARCH 2-4, 1972
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (93)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prophylactic Abdominal Drains

Paul F. Nora, MD; Robert M. Vanecko, MD; James J. Bransfield, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1972;105(2):173-176.


Abstract

The concept has been reaffirmed that bacteria migrate from the skin to the interior of an abdominal wound via drains. It has been shown that obvious infection developed in nine out of ten splenectomized dogs in which drains were placed before closure, but not in dogs with no drains. Fifty patients were subjected to abdominal procedures followed by insertion of abdominal drains. Bacterial growths from cultures of the interior portion of their drains, upon removal, revealed that in 17 out of 50 of these patients, there were definite skin contaminants on the interior part of their drains. These findings strongly suggest that bacteria do migrate via the drain into the interior. The authors seriously question the routine placement of prophylactic abdominal drains, in view of the increased virulence reported even among commensal microorganisms which migrate down these drains.



Author Affiliations

Chicago

From the departments of surgery, Northwestern University School of Medicine, and Columbus-Cuneo Medical Center, Chicago.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 7, 1972.

Read before the 29th annual meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Chicago, March 2, 1972.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Columbus-Cuneo Medical Center, 2520 N Lakeview Ave, Chicago 60614 (Dr. Nora).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effect of Drain Use in the Early Postoperative Period after Arthroscopically Assisted Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft
Dhawan et al.
Am J Sports Med 2003;31:419-424.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage After Elective Colonic Resection and Suprapromontory Anastomosis: A Multicenter Study Controlled by Randomization
Merad et al.
Arch Surg 1998;133:309-314.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1972 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.