You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 105 No. 5, November 1972 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (27)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Pulmonary Arterial Pressure as a Guide to the Hemodynamic Status of Surgical Patients

John B. Sharefkin, MD; John D. MacArthur, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1972;105(5):699-704.


Abstract

Eleven patients underwent surgery with central venous pressure (CVP) and pulmonary artery (PA) pressure monitoring. In operations with minor blood losses, PA pressure was stable except for transient peaks at the times of incision and extubation. In patients who had both prior evidence of heart disease and operations with large volume losses, PA end-diastolic pressure (PAEDP) was a more sensitive and reliable index of circulatory overload. Levels of PAEDP compatible with pulmonary edema were recorded despite normal CVP values in several such patients. Patients with heart disease had higher mean PAEDP and wider variation of PAEDP for any given CVP value, emphasizing the value of PAEDP in detecting discrepancy between right and left ventricular performance. Evidence of heart disease in patients who need large volumes of fluids is a sound indication for PAEDP or wedge pressure monitoring.



Author Affiliations

Boston

From the Division of Surgery and the Surgical Research Laboratories, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, and the Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 4, 1972.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Hospital, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston 02215 (Dr. Sharefkin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: Benefits vs Difficulties
Quinn and Quebbeman
Arch Surg 1981;116:872-876.
ABSTRACT  

Central Venous Pressure and Pulmonary Wedge Pressure: A Comparative Study in Anesthetized Surgical Patients
Samii et al.
Arch Surg 1976;111:1122-1125.
ABSTRACT  

Central Venous Pressure and Pulmonary Wedge Pressure in Critical Surgical Illness: A Comparison
Toussaint et al.
Arch Surg 1974;109:265-269.
ABSTRACT  

Correlation of Pulmonary Wedge and Left Atrial Pressures: A Study in the Patient Receiving Positive End Expiratory Pressure Ventilation
Lozman et al.
Arch Surg 1974;109:270-277.
ABSTRACT  

Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring in Acute Burn Management
German et al.
Arch Surg 1973;106:788-791.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1972 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.