You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 105 No. 6, December 1972 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 20TH SCIENTIFIC MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR SOCIETY, CARMEL, CALIF, JUNE 23-24, 1972
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (44)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Crossover Femoro-Femoral Grafts

Compromise or Preference: A Reappraisal

Donald K. Brief, MD; Joseph Alpert, MD; Victor Parsonnet, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1972;105(6):889-894.


Abstract

A series of 66 crossover femoro-femoral grafts performed during the past six years is reported. There were four early and three late graft closures at 4, 8, and 30 months postoperatively, caused by inadequate runoff or subsequent progression of arteriosclerosis distal to the bypass. One graft closure at 15 months was a result of unrecognized inflow occlusion. There has been no evidence of any "steal" phenomenon from the donor leg and flow studies suggest that this does not occur.

One operative death (less than 2%) and 14 late deaths were due primarily to cardiovascular disease. The low mortality, minimal morbidity, and long-term patency rate (84.9% at three, four, and five years) make crossover femoro-femoral grafting the procedure of choice in unilateral aorto-iliac occlusive disease.



Author Affiliations

Newark, NJ

From the Department of Surgery, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, and the College of Medicine and Dentistry, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 11, 1972.

Read before the 20th scientific meeting of the International Cardiovascular Society, Carmel, Calif, June 24, 1972.

Reprint requests to Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, 201 Lyons Ave, Newark, NJ 07112 (Dr. Brief).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Femorofemoral Bypass, Even in Pregnancy: A Case Report
Avrahami et al.
ANGIOLOGY 2000;51:331-333.
ABSTRACT  

Revascularization of the Lower Extremity : A Noninvasive Hemodynamic Comparison of Aorto-Femoral, Axillo-Femoral and Femoro-Femoral Bypass
Rathnasami and Hines
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1987;21:96-101.
ABSTRACT  

Revascularization of the Femoral Artery by Femoro-Femoral Cross-Over By-Pass Utilizing PTFE-Grafts. Hemodynamic Changes During Follow-Up
Christenson et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1985;19:348-357.
ABSTRACT  

Revascularization of the Lower Extremity: A Non-invasive Hemodynamic Comparison of Aorto-Femoral and Femoral-Femoral Bypass
Hines and Rivera
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1984;18:83-87.
ABSTRACT  

Accelerated Atherosclerosis in a Tortuous Iliac Artery Following Femorofemoral Bypass
Scher et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1982;16:296-301.
ABSTRACT  

A 12-Year Experience With Femorofemoral Crossover Grafts
Dick et al.
Arch Surg 1980;115:1359-1365.
ABSTRACT  

The Femoro-Femoral Bypass Graft: An Analysis of 81 Femoro-Femoral Grafts
Raithel
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1980;14:73-77.
 

Hemodynamic and Angiographic Guidelines in Selection of Patients for Femorofemoral Bypass
Flanigan et al.
Arch Surg 1978;113:1257-1262.
ABSTRACT  

Vascular Complications of Intra-aortic Balloon Pumping
Alpert et al.
Arch Surg 1976;111:1190-1195.
ABSTRACT  

Femorofemoral Bypass Graft in Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation
Barsamian et al.
Arch Surg 1976;111:1070-1072.
ABSTRACT  

Crossover Femorofemoral Grafts Followed Up Five Years or More: An Analysis
Brief et al.
Arch Surg 1975;110:1294-1299.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1972 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.