You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 105 No. 6, December 1972 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 20TH SCIENTIFIC MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR SOCIETY, CARMEL, CALIF, JUNE 23-24, 1972
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (29)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Aortoiliofemoral Thromboendarterectomy vs Bypass Graft

A Randomized Study

Donald J. Gaspard, MD; J. Louis Cohen, MD; Max R. Gaspar, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1972;105(6):898-901.


Abstract

Forty-three patients with aortoiliac arteriosclerosis were preoperatively assigned in random fashion, to a thromboendarterectomy (TEA) or a bypass graft (BPG) group without regard to the historical data, the preoperative aortograms, or the preoperative physical findings. Of 21 patients in the BPG group, the immediate success rate was 100% and all the patients left the hospital alive, though one died of an aortic suture line disruption six weeks postoperatively. Of 22 patients assigned to the TEA group, six required some form of BPG due to inability to complete TEA on one or both sides, an intraoperative failure rate of 27%. One patient in this group died postoperatively of renal failure. Aortoiliofemoral TEA and BPG are not comparable procedures. Anatomic factors and technical skill must be considered in choosing the proper operation.



Author Affiliations

Los Angeles

From the Department of General Surgery and the Vascular Surgery Service of the Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center and the University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 7, 1972.

Read before the 20th scientific meeting of the International Cardiovascular Society, Carmel, Calif, June 24, 1972.

Reprint requests to 123 Congress St, Pasadena, Calif 91105 (Dr. Gaspard).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Closed Endarterectomy: Preferred Operation for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease
Widdershoven and LeVeen
Arch Surg 1989;124:986-990.
ABSTRACT  

Vascular Surgery
JAMA 1972;222:1644-1645.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1972 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.