You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 106 No. 2, February 1973 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Iodine Inactivating Agent in Surgical Scrub Testing

COL Arthur Gross, DC, USA; SP5 Louis Cofone, USA; SP4 Michael B. Huff, USA

AMA Arch Surg. 1973;106(2):175-178.


Abstract

Fingertip impression cultures of 18 subjects and tests with pure cultures of bacteria have shown that 0.5% sodium thiosulfate inhibited bacterial growth up to 100%. The average bacterial colony counts of fingertip impressions of 18 subjects on two culture media without the inactivating agent were 100.8 and 104.6 as opposed to average counts of 12.4 and 15.2, respectively, on media with 0.5% sodium thiosulfate. Serial dilutions of pure cultures of bacteria confirmed results described above and indicated that the predominant inhabitant of skin, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and pathogenic S aureus are particularly sensitive to sodium thiosulfate. It is concluded that results of bacteriologic testing of iodine scrub preparations are misleading if sodium thiosulfate is incorporated into culture media.



Author Affiliations

Washington, DC

From the Division of Basic Sciences, US Army Institute of Dental Research, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 17, 1972.

Reprint requests to US Army Institute of Dental Research, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20012 (Dr. Gross).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Microbial decontamination of human donor eyes with povidone-iodine: penetration, toxicity, and effectiveness
Pels and Vrensen
Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:1019-1026.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chemical Preparation of the Eye in Ophthalmic Surgery: III. Effect of Povidone-Iodine on the Conjunctiva
Apt et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:728-729.
ABSTRACT  

The Surgical Scrub--Practical Consideration
Kundsin and Walter
Arch Surg 1973;107:75-77.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1973 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.