This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (13)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Ruth B. Kundsin, ScD; Carl W. Walter, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1973;107(1):75-77.

Abstract
Two scrubs were tested and compared under simulated conditions of use. The iodine preparation produced a greater immediate reduction in bacterial count than the hexachlorophene preparation; however, this advantage was lost after one hour. The bacterial count inside the gloves following the iodine preparation increased after one hour and was higher than the count one hour following the hexachlorophene preparation.

Because gloves are worn during surgery for periods longer than one hour, the choice of a scrub should be made on the basis of a prolonged depressant effect on the microbial flora of the hand. It is more appropriate to select a long-acting germicidal detergent than a single-short germicidal detergent with dwindling residual effect.

Author Affiliations
Boston

From the Department of Surgery, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Feb 28, 1973.

Reprint requests to Surgical Bacteriology Laboratory, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, 721 Huntington Ave, Boston 02115 (Dr. Kundsin).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?