 |
 |

Extrahepatic Portal HypertensionA Retrospective Analysis of 127 Cases and Associated Clinical Implications
Arthur B. Voorhees, Jr., MD;
John B. Price, Jr., MD
AMA Arch Surg. 1974;108(3):338-341.
Abstract
A retrospective study of 129 cases of extrahepatic portal hypertension was undertaken in an attempt to evaluate the relative merits of conservative versus surgical approaches to the condition. The complex interrelationships of multiple surgical procedures were untangled when possible, but the "need to intervene" has distorted the natural history of the disease so that statistical comparisons should be thought of as trends and not absolutes. There is obvious need for a prospective study of the disease; however, this must be developed as a multiinstitutional program because of the relatively low incidence of the disease and the great inconstancy of bleeding patterns in individual cases. Currently, the mesocaval shunt provides the best results and the esophagogastrectomy should be undertaken only in cases when a shunt is not possible and there is a high risk of massive bleeding from large varices.
Author Affiliations
New York
From the Department of Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University and the Presbyterian Hospital of New York.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication Oct 9, 1973.
Reprint requests to Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave, New York 10032 (Dr. Voorhees).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis: aetiology and determinants of survival
Janssen et al.
Gut 2001;49:720-724.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Free jejunal autograft combined with extensive esophagogastrectomy for unshuntable extrahepatic portal hypertension
Orloff et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1994;108:346-353.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Surgical Management of Portal Hypertension in Childhood: Long-term Results
Fonkalsrud
Arch Surg 1980;115:1042-1045.
ABSTRACT
|