This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (8)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Compression vs Fixation

Gerald S. Laros, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1974;108(5):698-702.

Abstract
In a fracture healing experiment using rabbit tibiae, apparatus was used to produce a constant measured compression at the site of surgically produced fractures. The apparatus did not hold the fracture rigidly immobilized, but permitted a degree of motion. Under these conditions, compression itself was not a uniformly beneficial factor in fracture healing. In excess, compression acted adversely on the healing process, resulting in slower healing and a bulkier, less mature callus. Excess compression was also related to an adverse response in the diaphysis manifested by resorption of bone along Haversian canals with resultant diminution of structural substance of the cortex.

Author Affiliations
Chicago

From the Section of Orthopedics, University of Chicago Hospitals and Clinic, Chicago.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Nov 19, 1973.

Reprint requests to Section of Orthopedics, University of Chicago Hospitals and Clinics, 950 E 59th St, Chicago, IL 60637 (Dr. Laros).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?