You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 109 No. 2, August 1974 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (41)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Peptic Ulcer Disease in the Transplant Recipient

Panayiotis K. Spanos, MD; Richard L. Simmons, MD; Luca C. Rattazzi, MD; Carl M. Kjellstrand, MD; Theodore J. Buselmeier, MD; John S. Najarian, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1974;109(2):193-197.


Abstract

Thirty of 377 patients gave evidence of peptic ulcer disease prior to renal transplantation. Prophylactic vagotomy with pyloroplasty or antrectomy was performed on 19 of these patients prior to transplantation, and 14 of 19 are well with transplants seven to 61 months later; only three of these patients have had posttransplant ulcer complications. No planned prophylactic operation was performed in 11 patients; nine of these patients bled in the pre- or post-transplant period. Only three of 347 patients without pretransplant evidence of ulcer bled in the posttransplant period. None of the patients with vagotomy-antrectomy showed evidence of recurrent bleeding, but patients with active ulcer disease pretransplant some-times had recurrences after vagotomy-pyloroplasty. One can conclude that pretransplant correction of the ulcerogenic tendency should be carried out and that antrectomy should be considered if active ulcers are present in the uremic transplant candidate.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 2, 1974.

Read before the 31st annual meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Cincinnati, March 7, 1974.

Reprint requests to University of Minnesota Hospitals, Box 185, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (Dr. Simmons).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Causes of Death After Kidney Transplantation
Washer et al.
JAMA 1983;250:49-54.
ABSTRACT  

Cimetidine, Posttransplant Peptic Ulcer Complications, and Renal Allograft Survival: A Clinical and Investigational Perspective
Burleson et al.
Arch Surg 1982;117:933-935.
ABSTRACT  

Gastrointestinal Complications After Renal Transplantation: Predictive Factors and Morbidity
Owens et al.
Arch Surg 1976;111:467-471.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1974 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.