You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 109 No. 2, August 1974 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ARTICLES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (33)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Hemodynamics of Autogenous Femoropopliteal Bypass

Hendrick B. Barner, MD; Donald L. Kaminski, MD; John E. Codd, MD; George C. Kaiser, MD; Vallee L. Willman, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1974;109(2):291-293.


Abstract



Intraoperative hemodynamics of 74 autogenous femoropopliteal bypass grafts observed for one to six years have been analyzed in an attempt to correlate these measurements with graft fate. Eighteen grafts failed by 12 months and three failed at 22, 23, and 49 months, respectively.

Basal graft flow, peak graft flow after injection of 15 mg of papaverine hydrochloride into the graft, basal mean pressure gradient across the graft, peak mean pressure gradient across the graft, basal and peak total peripheral resistance, basal and peak outflow tract resistance, quantitative status of the outflow tract by two grading systems, indication for operation, presence of diabetes mellitus, age and sex of the patient, and site of the distal anastomosis (proximal and distal parts of the popliteal artery) were not of predictive value and the differences were not statistically significant for patent and occluded grafts.



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Surgery, St. Louis University and Unit II Surgery, John Cochran Veterans Administration Hospital, St. Louis.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication April 5, 1974.

Read before the 31st annual meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Cincinnati, March 8, 1974.

Reprint requests to 1325 S Grand, St. Louis, MO 63104 (Dr. Barner).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Runoff Resistance and Early Graft Failure in Infrainguinal Bypass Surgery
Peterkin et al.
Arch Surg 1988;123:1199-1201.
ABSTRACT  

Technical Defects as a Cause of Early Graft Failure After Femorodistal Bypass
Stept et al.
Arch Surg 1987;122:599-604.
ABSTRACT  

Isolated Popliteal Segment v Tibial Bypass: Comparison of Hemodynamic and Clinical Results
Brewster et al.
Arch Surg 1984;119:775-779.
ABSTRACT  

Comparison of Above-Knee and Below-Knee Anastomosis in Femoropopliteal Bypass Grafts
Brewster et al.
Arch Surg 1981;116:1013-1018.
ABSTRACT  

Extremity Salvage by Revascularization
Barner et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1979;13:95-103.
ABSTRACT  

Doppler Ankle Systolic Blood Pressure: Prognostic Value in Vein Bypass Grafts of the Lower Extremity
Corson et al.
Arch Surg 1978;113:932-935.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1974 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.