You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 110 No. 8, August 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE THIRTY-SECOND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE CENTRAL SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, CHICAGO, FEBRUARY 27-28 AND MARCH 1, 1975
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (71)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Glucocorticoid and Antibiotic Effect on Experimental Gram-Negative Bacteremic Shock

Mary Pitcairn; James Schuler, MD; Peter R. Erve, PhD; Steven Holtzman, MD; William Schumer, MD

Arch Surg. 1975;110(8):1012-1015.


Abstract

This study was designed to answer the three following questions: (1) Are glucocorticoids as protective in Gram-negative bacteremic shock as they are in endotoxic shock? (2) Is there any difference in efficacy between a bacteriostatic and a bactericidal antibiotic in bacteremic shock? (3) Does the combination of glucocorticoid with antibiotic potentiate the individual protective effects of both? Bacteremia was induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats by a single intravenous injection of viable Escherichia coli. The results showed that dexamethasone sodium phosphate alone afforded significant protection against Gram-negative bacteremic shock up to eight hours after challenge. The choice of a bactericidal vs a bacteriostatic antibiotic did not influence the survival rates in this study. The survival rate was maximal when dexamethasone was used with both ampicillin sodium and gentamicin sulfate.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine, the Abraham Lincoln School of Medicine, and The Surgical Service, Veterans Administration West Side Hospital, Chicago (Ms. Pitcairn and Dr. Schuler), and the Department of Surgery, University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical School at Downey (Ill) Veterans Administration Hospital (Drs. Erve, Holtzman, and Schumer).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 18, 1975.

Read before the 32nd annual meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Chicago, March 1, 1975.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical School at Downey Veterans Administration Hospital, Downey, IL 60064 (Dr. Schumer).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Sepsis: Lessons Learned in the Last Century and Future Directions
Chaudry
Arch Surg 1999;134:922-929.
FULL TEXT  

A Sustained Rat Model for Studying the Long-Lasting Catabolic State of Sepsis
Breuille et al.
Infect. Immun. 1999;67:1079-1085.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Macrophage-Mediated Modulation of Hepatocyte Protein Synthesis: Effect of Dexamethasone
Keller et al.
Arch Surg 1986;121:1199-1205.
ABSTRACT  

The Cardiopulmonary Response to Massive Doses of Steroids in Patients With Septic Shock
Lucas and Ledgerwood
Arch Surg 1984;119:537-541.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1975 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.