You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 110 No. 8, August 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE THIRTY-SECOND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE CENTRAL SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, CHICAGO, FEBRUARY 27-28 AND MARCH 1, 1975
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (40)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Accuracy of Ultrasound in Diagnosing Abdominal Masses

Robert Richardson, MD; Lawrence W. Norton, MD; John Eule, MD; Ben Eiseman, MD

Arch Surg. 1975;110(8):933-939.


Abstract

B-mode ultrasonography was performed in 246 patients with suspected abdominal masses over a seven-year period. In 105 (43%), the accuracy of ultrasonic diagnosis was evaluated surgically. Sonography was proven correct in 60 (57%) patients who had undergone operation. Among 141 patients who had not undergone operation and whose diagnoses were established by other means, ultrasonography agreed with the clinical diagnosis in 69 (31%).

Ultrasound accuracy, as confirmed by operation, was highest for splenic masses (100%) and for aortic aneurysm (88%). Liver masses were correctly identified in 56% of patients and gallbladder lesions in 38%. While only a 48% accuracy was obtained in diagnosing pancreatic disease, 64% of all pseudocysts were localized. Ultrasonography correlated positively with operative findings in 56% of renal masses. Intraperitoneal abscess was accurately diagnosed in 61% of patients but retroperitoneal adenopathy in only 33%.

Abdominal ultrasonography, while accurately diagnosing splenic and aortic masses, failed to identify approximately half of other mass lesions. Improved techniques hold promise of improving this diagnostic accuracy.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Denver General Hospital and the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 14, 1975.

Read before the 32nd annual meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Chicago, Feb 28, 1975.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Denver General Hospital, Denver, CO 80204 (Dr. Norton).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Tender Pulsatile Abdominal Mass: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm or Not?
Kadir et al.
Arch Surg 1980;115:631-633.
ABSTRACT  

A Diagnostic Approach to the Adult With Fever of Unknown Origin
Esposito and Gleckman
Arch Intern Med 1979;139:575-579.
ABSTRACT  

Indium 111 Autologous Tagged Leukocytes in the Diagnosis of Intraperitoneal Sepsis
Ascher et al.
Arch Surg 1979;114:386-392.
ABSTRACT  

Clinical and Roentgenographic Findings in Splenic Abscess
Miller et al.
Arch Surg 1976;111:1156-1159.
ABSTRACT  

False-Positive Gray-Scale Ultrasonography for Intra-abdominal Abscesses
Cunningham
Arch Surg 1976;111:810-811.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1975 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.