You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 111 No. 11, November 1976 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 24th SCIENTIFIC MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR SOCIETY, ALBUQUERQUE, NM, JUNE 18-19, 1976
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (29)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Arm Veins for Peripheral Arterial Reconstruction

Karl R. Clayson, MD; William H. Edwards, MD; Terry R. Allen, MD; W. Andrew Dale, MD

Arch Surg. 1976;111(11):1276-1280.


Abstract

• The ipsilateral saphenous vein has become accepted as the best available material for femoropopliteal bypass and for arterial patch grafts as well as for visceral and cardiac bypasses. However, in a few patients, nonavailability or nonsuitability of the saphenous vein forces use of some other material.

We report an experience with 32 operations using arm veins. Among the 11 long vein grafts, seven composite vein-Dacron or vein-vein grafts, and 14 vein patch grafts during the past six years, there were no infections or aneurysms and only nine thrombotic failures have been detected to date, to our knowledge.

Our present indications are (1) ipsilateral saphenous vein is not available or is not suitable, (2) only a short graft or patch is needed and the saphenous vein may therefore be saved for the future, (3) to join to a saphenous graft or to a Dacron composite graft for additional length, and (4) to reconstruct an arm artery. Our experiences using cephalic and basilic veins confirms them as a useful source of autogenous material for arterial reconstruction.

(Arch Surg 111:1276-1280, 1976)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery, St Thomas Hospital and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.


Footnotes

Read before the 24th scientific meeting of the International Cardiovascular Society, Albuquerque, NM, June 19, 1976.

Reprint requests to 520 Mid-State Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203 (Dr Dale).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Basilic Vein Thrombosis Near an Arterial-Venous Access Graft Resulting in a Symptomatic Upper Extremity: A Case Report
de la Torre et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1990;24:524-529.
ABSTRACT  

The Alternative to the Saphenous Vein as an Arterial Graft
Limet
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1984;18:201-210.
ABSTRACT  

Chronic Upper Extremity Arterial Insufficiency: Etiology, Manifestations, and Operative Management
Gross et al.
Arch Surg 1978;113:419-423.
ABSTRACT  

Improved Results With Femoropopliteal Vein Grafts for Limb Salvage
LoGerfo et al.
Arch Surg 1977;112:567-570.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1976 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.