You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 112 No. 10, October 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (37)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cardiac Output and Pulmonary Wedge Pressure

Use for Evaluation of Fluid Replacement in Trauma Patients

Dhiraj M. Shah, MD; Bruce D. Browner, MD; Robert E. Dutton, MD; Jonathan C. Newell, PhD; Samuel R. Powers, Jr, MD

Arch Surg. 1977;112(10):1161-1164.


Abstract

• Cardiac output and pulmonary wedge pressure (PWP) were used to evaluate the end point of fluid resuscitation in 20 patients suffering from multiple trauma and shock. Eleven patients received crystalloid resuscitation and nine patients received colloid resuscitation. Fifteen of 20 patients had an adequate cardiac output at the termination of resuscitation, but only six of these patients had a PWP above 10 mm Hg. There was no significant correlation between left ventricular stroke work index and PWP in these patients, either at the completion of resuscitation or during the following three days. Five patients did not achieve adequate cardiac output and four of these patients died, suggesting that cardiac output was the most important criterion for adequate resuscitation. If the goal of fluid resuscitation is to achieve an adequate cardiac output, then PWP was not a reliable guide. Furthermore, using both cardiac output and PWP as a guide to fluid resuscitation of our patients, we found that the type of fluid (crystalloid or colloid) for resuscitation did not influence the course of respiratory distress in these patients up to three days following resuscitation.

(Arch Surg 112:1161-1164, 1977)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Shah, Browner, and Powers), Physiology (Drs Dutton and Newell), and Medicine (Dr Dutton), Albany Medical College.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 22, 1977.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY 12208 (Dr Powers).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evidence-based Colloid Use in the Critically Ill: American Thoracic Society Consensus Statement
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2004;170:1247-1259.
FULL TEXT  

Patient Survival after Human Albumin Administration: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials
Wilkes and Navickis
ANN INTERN MED 2001;135:149-164.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human albumin administration in critically ill patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials • Why albumin may not work
Reviewers and Reviewers
BMJ 1998;317:235-240.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Aspects of the Management of Shock
SHINE et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1980;93:723-734.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1977 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.