You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 112 No. 7, July 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  SYMPOSIUM ON PAIN: PART II Guest Editor: John J. Bonica, MD, Seattle
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (49)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Electromyographic Biofeedback for Pain Related to Muscle Tension

A Study of Tension Headache, Back, and Jaw Pain

Connie L. Peck, PhD; George H. Kraft, MD

Arch Surg. 1977;112(7):889-895.


Abstract



• We review the literature on the application of electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback to tension-related headaches, back and shoulder pain, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain and present clinical treatment data on 18 patients with tension headaches, eight patients with back and shoulder pain, and six patients with TMJ pain. Electromyographic tension levels declined in all groups of patients; pain declined significantly in 12 of 18 patients with tension headaches and one of eight back pain patients, and decreased slightly in three headache patients, three back and shoulder pain patients, and two patients with TMJ pain. Conclusions suggest that EMG biofeedback is generally more effective in treating tension headaches, but much less effective in the treatment of back, shoulder, or jaw pain, although the numbers of patients are small in the latter two groups.

(Arch Surg 112:889-895, 1977)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine RJ-30, University of Washington School of Medicine (Dr Kraft) and University Hospital, University of Washington (Dr Peck), Seattle.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Dec 28, 1976.

Reprint requests to Department of Rehabilitation Medicine RJ-30, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195 (Dr Kraft).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Systems Model of Chronic Musculo-Skeletal Pain
Large et al.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1990;24:529-536.
ABSTRACT  

Biofeedback for Headaches
HEALTH AND PUBLIC POLICY COMMITTEE
ANN INTERN MED 1985;102:128-131.
ABSTRACT  

Symposium on Pain: Evaluation and Treatment of the Painful Upper Extremity
OMER
J Hand Surg Eur Vol 1984;9:20-23.
 

The Chronic Pain Syndrome: Misconceptions and Management
REULER et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1980;93:588-596.
ABSTRACT  

Biofeedback in the Treatment of Tension Headache: Current Status
Nuechterlein and Holroyd
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1980;37:866-873.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1977 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.