You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 112 No. 8, August 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, PALM SPRINGS, CALIF, JAN 14-16, 1977
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Profunda Femoris-Popliteal Artery Bypass

Bruce E. Stabile, MD; Samuel E. Wilson, MD

Arch Surg. 1977;112(8):913-918.


Abstract

• The profunda femoris artery can be used for the origin of a femoropopliteal bypass in cases of previous aortofemoral bypass graft, short saphenous vein, and other less common conditions that render the common femoral artery unsuitable for proximal anastomosis. Fourteen profunda-popliteal bypass procedures were performed in 12 patients between 1973 and 1976. The indications for surgery were incapacitating claudication in seven, and rest pain or tissue necrosis in five patients. Electromagnetic flow measurements at operation in ten patients indicated a mean graft blood flow of 146 ± 51 ml/min. The mean Doppler ankle/wrist pressure ratio improved from 0.48 ± 0.11 preoperatively to 0.87 ± 0.14 postoperatively, while the plethysmographic mean pulse volume increased from 1.1 ± 0.6 µl to 2.4 ± 0.4 µl. Thirteen of the 14 grafts remain patent at one to three years' follow-up. The profunda-popliteal bypass is an effective alternative to standard femoropopliteal bypass in cases where the common femoral artery is not available for proximal graft anastomosis.

(Arch Surg 112:913-918, 1977)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Dr Stabile) and Vascular Surgery (Dr Wilson), Veterans Administration Wadsworth Hospital Center, Los Angeles, and the University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine (Dr Wilson).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 16, 1977.

Read before the annual meeting of the Southern California Chapter of the American College of Surgeons, Palm Springs, Calif, Jan 14, 1977.

Reprint requests to Surgical Service (691/112K), VA Wadsworth Hospital Center, Wilshire and Sawtelle Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90073 (Dr Wilson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Direct Approaches to the Middle and Distal Portions of the Deep Femoral Artery for Use as Sites of Origin or Termination for Secondary Bypasses
Veith et al.
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1988;1:94-102.
 

Reconstructive Surgery for Combined Aortofemoral and Infrafemoral Occlusion
Nakata
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1980;14:403-408.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1977 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.