You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 11, November 1978 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 26TH SCIENTIFIC MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR SOCIETY, LOS ANGELES, JUNE 23 and 24, 1978
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Hemodynamic and Angiographic Guidelines in Selection of Patients for Femorofemoral Bypass

D. Preston Flanigan, MD; Dennis G. Pratt; James J. Goodreau, MD; Steven J. Burnham, MD; James S. T. Yao, MD, PhD; John J. Bergan, MD

Arch Surg. 1978;113(11):1257-1262.


Abstract

• Although crossover femorofemoral grafts have had good long-term patency, all patients have not been symptomatically improved. Seventy-one patients underwent 80 femorofemoral bypasses from 1968 to 1978. Hemodynamic assessment included preoperative and postoperative segmental Doppler pressures and femoral artery waveform recordings. Preoperative and selective postoperative arteriography was routinely performed. Twenty-nine failures occurred predominately in two groups, those with greater than 50% stenosis of the donor iliac artery and those with severe recipient limb outflow occlusive disease. Ten patients with normal outflow beds bilaterally associated with 10% to 50% stenosis of the donor iliac artery underwent successful femorofemoral reconstruction. Progression of donor iliac artery disease was seen in only two patients. Cumulative five-year patency was 74%. Operative mortality totaled three (3.8%).

This study supports the use of femorofemoral bypass as a primary procedure when proper guidelines are used.

(Arch Surg 113:1257-1262, 1978)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Vascular Surgery of the Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 17, 1978.

Read before the 26th scientific meeting of the International Cardiovascular Society, Los Angeles, June 23, 1978.

Reprint requests to Division of Vascular Surgery of the Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School, 303 E Chicago Ave, Chicago, IL 60611 (Dr Bergan).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

MR Angiography of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: A Phase III Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Blood-Pool Contrast Agent MS-325
Goyen et al.
Radiology 2005;236:825-833.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease in Patients with Known or Suspected Peripheral Vascular Disease: Safety and Efficacy of Gadofosveset-enhanced MR Angiography--Multicenter Comparative Phase III Study
Rapp et al.
Radiology 2005;236:71-78.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Femorofemoral Bypass
Schneider
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1999;11:113-123.
ABSTRACT  

Donor Limb Vascular Events Following Femoro-Femoral Bypass Surgery
A Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study
Arch Surg 1991;126:681-686.
ABSTRACT  

Iliofemoral Crossover Bypass in High-Risk Patients: Management and Results
Wandschneider et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1989;23:8-14.
ABSTRACT  

Aortic Reconstruction vs Extra-anatomic Bypass and Angioplasty: Thoughts on Evolving a Protocol for Selection
Bunt
Arch Surg 1986;121:1166-1171.
ABSTRACT  

The Femorofemoral Graft: Hemodynamic Improvement and Patency Rate
Lamerton et al.
Arch Surg 1985;120:1274-1278.
ABSTRACT  

Revascularization of the Femoral Artery by Femoro-Femoral Cross-Over By-Pass Utilizing PTFE-Grafts. Hemodynamic Changes During Follow-Up
Christenson et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1985;19:348-357.
ABSTRACT  

Crossover Femorofemoropopliteal Sequential Bypass for Combined Ipsilateral Iliac and Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease
Schuler et al.
Arch Surg 1984;119:456-461.
ABSTRACT  

Accelerated Atherosclerosis in a Tortuous Iliac Artery Following Femorofemoral Bypass
Scher et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1982;16:296-301.
ABSTRACT  

Elimination of Iatrogenic Impotence and Improvement of Sexual Function After Aortoiliac Revascularization
Flanigan et al.
Arch Surg 1982;117:544-550.
ABSTRACT  

The Value of Toe Blood Pressure Measurement in Arterial Reconstructive Surgery
Hirai et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1981;15:380-387.
 

Reconstructive Surgery for Combined Aortofemoral and Infrafemoral Occlusion
Nakata
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1980;14:403-408.
ABSTRACT  

A 12-Year Experience With Femorofemoral Crossover Grafts
Dick et al.
Arch Surg 1980;115:1359-1365.
ABSTRACT  

Aortic Grafting Procedures: Tailoring the Options
Owens et al.
Arch Surg 1980;115:1099-1102.
ABSTRACT  

The Femoro-Femoral Bypass Graft: An Analysis of 81 Femoro-Femoral Grafts
Raithel
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1980;14:73-77.
 

Surgical Options in the Correction of Vasculogenic Impotence
DePalma et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1980;14:92-103.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1978 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.