You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 11, November 1978 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 26TH SCIENTIFIC MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR SOCIETY, LOS ANGELES, JUNE 23 and 24, 1978
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Effect of Arterial Reconstruction on Limb Salvage

A Ten-Year Appraisal

Baltej S. Maini, MD; John A. Mannick, MD

Arch Surg. 1978;113(11):1297-1304.


Abstract

• Two hundred forty-four consecutive patients were reviewed who presented themselves over a ten-year period (1967 to 1977) with threatened limb loss secondary to arteriosclerosis involving the arteries supplying the lower extremities. Patients with claudication as the presenting complaint were not included. Primary amputation was performed in 14 patients (6%), with an operative mortality of 21%, whereas arterial reconstructive surgery was carried out in 230 patients (94%) with an operative mortality of 2.7%.

One hundred eleven femoral-popliteal vein grafts in 101 patients showed a cumulative five-year graft patency of 78% with a limb salvage rate of 89%. Forty-four femoral-tibial vein grafts in 41 patients had a five-year graft patency of 55% and a limb salvage rate of 73%. Twenty-eight femoral-femoral grafts and 21 axillary-bilateral femoral grafts yielded five-year graft patency rates of 91% and 77%, respectively: the limb salvage rates were 91% and 86%. Inclusive of the 14 patients undergoing primary amputation, the overall five-year cumulative limb salvage in the entire group was 76%.

(Arch Surg 113:1297-1304, 1978)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, and the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 27, 1978.

Presented at the 26th scientific meeting of the International Cardiovascular Society, Los Angeles, June 24, 1978.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, 721 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (Dr Mannick).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Surgery or Endovascular Surgery for Chronic Lower Extremity Ischemia: What Selection Criteria Should We Use?
Colburn and Moore
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1995;8:31-55.
 

Functional Benefits of Peripheral Vascular Bypass Surgery for Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Regensteiner et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1993;27:437-446.
ABSTRACT  

Functional Benefits of Peripheral Vascular Bypass Surgery for Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Regensteiner et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1993;27:369-378.
ABSTRACT  

Functional Benefits of Peripheral Vascular Bypass Surgery for Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Regensteiner et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1993;44:1-10.
ABSTRACT  

Hospital Reimbursement, Severity of Illness, and the Government Relations Committee
Veith
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1993;6:135-140.
 

Elective Arterial Reconstruction for Intermittent Claudication is Justified
Esato et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1992;26:42-46.
ABSTRACT  

A Flexible Approach to Infrapopliteal Vein Grafts in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
Pomposelli et al.
Arch Surg 1991;126:724-729.
ABSTRACT  

DRGs and Vascular Surgery: How Well Is Our Interface With Government Working?
Veith
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1990;3:1-7.
 

Limb Salvage Despite Extensive Tissue Loss: Free Tissue Transfer Combined With Distal Revascularization
Cronenwett et al.
Arch Surg 1989;124:609-615.
ABSTRACT  

Endothelial Cell Seeding: Is It Practical?
Whittemore
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1989;2:126-132.
 

Polytetrafluoroethylene Grafts as the First-Choice Arterial Substitute in Femoropopliteal Revascularization
Quinones-Baldrich et al.
Arch Surg 1984;119:1238-1243.
ABSTRACT  

Femoropopliteal Graft Failures: Clinical Consequences and Success of Secondary Reconstructions
Brewster et al.
Arch Surg 1983;118:1043-1047.
ABSTRACT  

Early Experience With Popliteal to Infrapopliteal Bypass for Limb Salvage
Schuler et al.
Arch Surg 1983;118:472-476.
ABSTRACT  

Femorotibial and Femoroperoneal Bypass Vein Grafts: A 15-Year Experience
Kacoyanis et al.
Arch Surg 1981;116:1529-1534.
ABSTRACT  

Endarterectomy for Segmental Occlusive Disease of the Superficial Femoral Artery
Inahara and Scott
Arch Surg 1981;116:1547-1553.
ABSTRACT  

Comparison of Above-Knee and Below-Knee Anastomosis in Femoropopliteal Bypass Grafts
Brewster et al.
Arch Surg 1981;116:1013-1018.
ABSTRACT  

Monitor-Guided Responses: Operability With Safety Is Increased in Patients With Peripheral Vascular Diseases
Babu et al.
Arch Surg 1980;115:1384-1386.
ABSTRACT  

Femoropopliteal Bypass Grafting for Intermittent Claudication: Is Pessimism Warranted?
Donaldson and Mannick
Arch Surg 1980;115:724-727.
ABSTRACT  

Revascularization for Severe Limb Ischemia
Perdue et al.
Arch Surg 1980;115:168-171.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1978 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.