 |
 |

Doppler Cerebrovascular Examination, Oculoplethysmography, and Ocular PneumoplethysmographyUse in Detection of Carotid Disease: A Prospective Clinical Study
Lt Col Paul T. McDonald, MC, USA;
Col Norman M. Rich, MC, USA;
Lt Col George J. Collins, MC, USA;
Lt Col Charles A. Andersen, MC, USA;
Maj Louis Kozloff, MC, USA
Arch Surg. 1978;113(11):1341-1349.
Abstract
 |  |
To determine the comparative accuracy of three noninvasive cerebrovascular testing systems, 72 patients underwent complete evaluation by Doppler cerebrovascular examination (DCE), oculoplethysmography (OPG-Kartchner), ocular pneumoplethysmography (OPG-Gee), and angiography. Considering 60% diameter stenosis or more by angiography as a true positive finding, the noninvasive tests of the 72 patients showed the following results: DCE, two false-positive, 17 false-negative, and 53 correct with an overall accuracy of 74%; OPG-Kartchner, six false-positive, four false-negative, and 62 correct with an overall accuracy of 86%; and OPG-Gee, no false-positive, two false-negative, and 70 correct with an overall accuracy of 97%. Independent of noninvasive test results, 57 symptomatic and three asymptomatic patients were selected for carotid endarterectomy. Of these 60 patients, 55 (92%) had positive preoperative OPG-Gee tracings. Noninvasive testing is a valuable adjunct in identifying patients who ultimately require carotid endarterectomy. Although considerable carotid ulceration may be undetected by noninvasive study, it was uncommon in this series.
(Arch Surg 113:1341-1349, 1978)
Author Affiliations
From the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, and the Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication July 17, 1978.
Read before the 26th annual meeting of the International Cardiovascular Society, Los Angeles, June 24, 1978.
The opinion or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.
Reprint requests to Peripheral Vascular Surgery Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20012 (Dr McDonald).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Duplex Ultrasound and Ocular Pneumoplethysmography Concordance in Detecting Severe Carotid Stenosis
Castaldo et al.
Arch Neurol 1989;46:518-522.
ABSTRACT
An Introduction to Carotid Duplex Sonography
Poehlmann and Bigongiari
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography 1986;2:2-11.
ABSTRACT
The Underlying Problems Resulting in Controversies in the Clinical Management of Transient Ischemic Attacks: An Overview
Slade et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1983;34:639-645.
ABSTRACT
The Limitations of the Digitalized Pulse Timing Oculoplethysmography in the Diagnosis of Bilateral Significant Carotid Stenosis
AbuRahma et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1983;34:604-609.
ABSTRACT
Carotid Artery Stenosis--Hemodynamic Significance and Clinical Course
Busuttil et al.
JAMA 1981;245:1438-1441.
ABSTRACT
Oculoplethysmography/ Carotid Phonoangiography: Its Value as a Screening Test in Patients With Suspected Carotid Artery Stenosis
Keagy et al.
Arch Surg 1980;115:1199-1202.
ABSTRACT
Spontaneous Dissection of Internal Carotid Arteries: Spontaneous Resolution Documented by Serial Ocular Pneumoplethysmography and Angiography
Gee et al.
Arch Surg 1980;115:944-949.
ABSTRACT
Diagnostic Accuracy of Ocular Pneumoplethysmography Attachment for Pulse Volume Recorder
Berkowitz
Arch Surg 1980;115:190-193.
ABSTRACT
Noninvasive Diagnosis of Extracranial Carotid Arterial Disease: A Prospective Evaluation of Pulsed-Doppler Imaging and Oculoplethysmography
Sumner et al.
Arch Surg 1979;114:1222-1229.
ABSTRACT
Limitations of Noninvasive Evaluation of Carotid Occlusive Disease
Herrmann et al.
Arch Surg 1979;114:1049-1051.
ABSTRACT
Carotid Endarterectomy Shunting: Effectiveness Determined by Operative Ocular Pneumoplethysmography
Gee et al.
Arch Surg 1979;114:720-721.
ABSTRACT
|