You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 12, December 1978 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Surgical Management of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Value of Early Diagnosis and Prompt Surgical Intervention

Unsup Kim, MD; Jack Rudick, MD, FRCS; Arthur H. Aufses, Jr, MD

Arch Surg. 1978;113(12):1444-1447.


Abstract

• We reviewed the results of operative management of 113 cases of acute upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The study shows a significant improvement in mortality of emergency and urgent surgery for acute massive upper GI hemorrhage, compared to our earlier report in 1974. The aggressive diagnostic approach utilized endoscopy or abdominal angiogram as an initial diagnostic procedure, which provided accurate or useful information regarding the source and nature of the bleeding in 98% of the cases, and the prompt surgical intervention when (1) a patient continued to bleed, requiring blood transfusions at the rate of more than 500 ml in six hours in order to maintain stable vital signs; (2) recurrent bleeding developed while the patient was under treatment in the hospital; and (3) the patient had an actively bleeding gastric ulcer. This aggressive diagnostic approach was the principal contributing factor in improved survival rate. The choice of operative procedure in acutely bleeding patients should be made on the basis of local findings, the nature of bleeding lesions, the general condition and age of the patient, and the experience of the operating surgeon. Our study does not permit a valid conclusion as to the operative procedure of choice for massive upper GI bleeding. Vagotomy and pyloroplasty with suture ligation of bleeding points was more frequently used in critically ill, poor-risk patients, where more extensive resectional surgery was not warranted, and has been found to be extremely effective in controlling the bleeding.

(Arch Surg 113:1444-1447, 1978)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York and the City Hospital Center at Elmhurst (NY), affiliate of Mount Sinai School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 5, 1978.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Services, City Hospital Center at Elmhurst, 79-01 Broadway, Elmhurst, NY 11373 (Dr Kim).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Outcome of Operations for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding: An Update
Elerding et al.
Arch Surg 1980;115:1473-1477.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1978 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.