You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 6, June 1978 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Antecolic or Retrocolic Anastomoses in Billroth II Gastrojejunostomy?

Stephen G. ReMine, MD; Jonathan A. van Heerden, MB, ChB, FRCS(C), FACS; Linda Magness, MD; Oliver H. Beahrs, MD, FACS

Arch Surg. 1978;113(6):735-736.


Abstract

• A retrospective study of major postoperative morbidity in two groups (50 patients each) that underwent Billroth II gastrectomy for duodenal ulcer disease showed no difference according to the type of anastomosis used (antecolic vs retrocolic). Prevention was not related to the type of anastomosis used, the main means of prevention being the use of meticulous care during the gastrojejunostomy.

(Arch Surg 113:735-736, 1978)



Author Affiliations

From the Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 18, 1978.

Reprint requests to c/o Section of Publications, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55901 (Dr ReMine).







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1978 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.