You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 11, November 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 27TH SCIENTIFIC MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR SOCIETY, NASHVILLE, TENN, JUNE 28-30, 1979-PART I
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (38)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Noninvasive Prediction of Amputation Level in Diabetic Patients

Gary W. Gibbons, MD; Frank C. Wheelock, Jr, MD; Carol Siembieda, RN; Carl S. Hoar, Jr, MD; John L. Rowbotham, MD; Alfred B. Persson, MD

Arch Surg. 1979;114(11):1253-1257.


Abstract

• Noninvasive laboratory testing was used to predict successful amputation levels in 150 diabetic patients. The cases of 100 patients undergoing forefoot amputation and 50 patients undergoing below-knee amputation were evaluated using segmental systolic pressures and pulse volume recordings (PVRs). The decision for and the level of amputation were based solely on clinical judgment. In patients undergoing forefoot amputation, segmental systolic pressures were falsely high or predicted incorrectly in over half the cases. Segmental PVRs were correctly predictive in only half of the cases. In patients undergoing below-knee amputation, segmental systolic pressures were falsely high or predicted incorrectly in over one third of cases. Segmental PVRs were correctly predictive in less than one third of the cases. In the diabetic patient, clinical judgment continues to provide the most accurate and reliable information by which the type of amputation and likelihood of its success can be judged.

(Arch Surg 114:1253-1257, 1979)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, New England Deaconess Hospital and the Joslin Clinic Division, Joslin Diabetic Foundation, Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 23, 1979.

Read before the 27th scientific meeting of the International Cardiovascular Society, Nashville, Tenn, June 28, 1979.

Reprint requests to 110 Francis St, Boston, MA 02215 (Dr Gibbons).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Major Lower Extremity Amputation: Outcome of a Modern Series
Aulivola et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:395-399.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improved Results With Diabetic Below-Knee Amputations
Fearon et al.
Arch Surg 1985;120:777-780.
ABSTRACT  

Below-Knee Amputation: Is the Effort to Preserve the Knee Joint Justified?
Castronuovo et al.
Arch Surg 1980;115:1184-1187.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.