You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 11, November 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 27TH SCIENTIFIC MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR SOCIETY, NASHVILLE, TENN, JUNE 28-30, 1979-PART I
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Reoperation for Recurrent Coronary Artery Disease

Causes, Indications, and Results in 168 Patients

George J. Reul, Jr, MD; Denton A. Cooley, MD; David A. Ott, MD; Aldemir Coelho, MD; Liberato Chapa, MD; Ivo Eterovic, MD

Arch Surg. 1979;114(11):1269-1275.


Abstract

• Of the 13,049 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery, 168 underwent a second or third operation because of the failure of the first. The early mortality was eight of 168. Good to excellent results were obtained in 141 patients. The cumulative survival rate was 82% at six years. Graft failure and the progression of atherosclerosis to a critical lesion were the most common reasons for reoperation, and perioperative myocardial infarction and incomplete initial operation were the least common. Long-term follow-up showed a peak of graft failure and progression of disease in nongrafted arteries at three years and decreased thereafter. Progression of distal disease in grafted arteries was not temporally related and was uncommon. Thrombosis of the vein graft could be related most frequently to the distal circulation rather than the vein graft itself.

(Arch Surg 114:1269-1275, 1979)



Author Affiliations

From the Texas Heart Institute, Houston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 23, 1979.

Read before the 27th scientific meeting of the International Cardiovascular Society, Nashville, Tenn, June 28, 1979.

Reprint requests to Texas Heart Institute, PO Box 20345, Houston, TX 77025 (Dr Reul).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Coronary Angioplasty in Patients with Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Unterberg et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1992;43:653-660.
ABSTRACT  

Percutaneous Angioplasty of Totally Occluded Coronary Vein Bypass Grafts: Case Histories
Mosseri et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1990;41:44-52.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.