You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 4, April 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE EIGHTY-SIXTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, SCOTTSDALE, ARIZ, NOV 12-15, 1978
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (31)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Colonoscopy

A Critical Review of 662 Examinations

Carl O. Knutson, MD; Martin H. Max, MD

Arch Surg. 1979;114(4):430-435.


Abstract

• The results of 662 therapeutic and diagnostic colonoscopic examinations were reviewed to assess the morbidity, clinical benefit, diagnostic accuracy, and indications for the procedure, with special emphasis on detection and endoscopic excision of small, occult, invasive cancers. Overall, the frequency of detecting occult lesions (19%), the (89%) ability to clarify questionable radiographic findings, and a substantial reduction in laparotomycolotomy procedures required for removal of colonic polyps (88%), coupled with a low morbidity (3%) and low false-negative examination rate (1%) established colonoscopy as one of the most important advances in the management of colon disease in recent years. Although early experience suggests that small, occult, invasive carcinomas, when properly selected, could be adequately treated by endoscopic excision, larger series and longer follow-up periods are necessary to validate any conclusions regarding the decision to manage these lesions conservatively.

(Arch Surg 114:430-435, 1979)



Author Affiliations

From the Section of Surgical Endoscopy, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Health Sciences Center.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Dec 7, 1978.

Read before the 86th annual meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Scottsdale, Ariz, Nov 14, 1978.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Health Sciences Center, PO Box 35260, Louisville, KY 40232 (Dr Knutson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Strategies for Screening for Colorectal Carcinoma
England et al.
Med Decis Making 1989;9:3-13.
ABSTRACT  

The Workup of the Asymptomatic Patient with a Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test
Brandeau and Eddy
Med Decis Making 1987;7:32-46.
ABSTRACT  

Colonoscopy After Curative Resection of Colorectal Cancer
Larson et al.
Arch Surg 1986;121:535-540.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.