You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 4, April 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE EIGHTY-SIXTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, SCOTTSDALE, ARIZ, NOV 12-15, 1978
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (31)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evaluation of Intragastric pH in Acutely Ill Patients

Virginia Herrmann, MD; Donald L. Kaminski, MD

Arch Surg. 1979;114(4):511-514.


Abstract



• The effect of various modalities on maintaining a high intragastric pH in acutely ill patients was evaluated. Twelve patients with one or more organ system failures had the effect of nasogastric suction, intragastric antacid instillation, and intravenous cimetidine administration on intragastric pH determined by an indwelling, intragastric pH probe. Each therapeutic modality was administered for 12 hours and the order of performance randomized. Nasogastric suction was associated with a constant intragastric pH of < 2.0. Mean intragastric pH with cimetidine administration was significantly higher than with antacid administration and consistently > 5.0. If low intragastric pH represents susceptibility to acute mucosal lesions, cimetidine therapy was more effective than antacids in the doses and frequency of administration used in this study in maintaining a high intragastric pH, and it may be effective in preventing stress ulcer formation.

(Arch Surg 114:511-514, 1979)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Surgery, St Louis University.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Dec 22, 1978.

Read before the 86th annual meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Scottsdale, Ariz, Nov 15, 1978.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, 1325 S Grand Blvd, St Louis, MO 63104 (Dr Kaminski).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pharmacological Approach to the Prevention and Treatment of Stress Ulcers
Gonzalez
J Intensive Care Med 1990;5:S10-S16.
ABSTRACT  

Prophylactic Therapy for Stress Ulcer Bleeding: A Reappraisal
SHUMAN et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1987;106:562-567.
ABSTRACT  

Cimetidine for Prevention and Treatment of Gastroduodenal Mucosal Lesions in Patients in an Intensive Care Unit
PEURA and JOHNSON
ANN INTERN MED 1985;103:173-177.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluation of Various Techniques to Monitor Intragastric pH
Meiners et al.
Arch Surg 1982;117:288-291.
ABSTRACT  

Cimetidine vs Antacid in Prophylaxis for Stress Ulceration
Weigelt et al.
Arch Surg 1981;116:597-601.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.