You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 6, June 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  EDITORIAL
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Use of Umbilical Vein Graft as an Arterial Substitute

Eugene B. Ferris, MD; John J. Cranley, MD

Arch Surg. 1979;114(6):694-697.


Abstract

• Seventy reconstructions, 14 to the popliteal artery above the knee, 40 to the popliteal artery below the knee, and 16 to the tibioperoneal arteries were performed with the Dardik umbilical vein graft tanned in glutaraldehyde. Indications for use included absence of or inadequate saphenous veins, or for expediency during emergency or complex procedures. The cumulative patency rate (calculated by the life table method) for the total group was 77% at 18 months. The failures are further analyzed according to the type of procedure, the grade of disease, and the distal runoff vessel. Early failures were attributed primarily to poor runoff and not to intrinsic properties of the graft. Our overall experience with the umbilical vein graft has been good. Further long-term follow-up is necessary.

(Arch Surg 114:694-697, 1979)



Author Affiliations

From the Vascular Research Laboratory, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 9, 1978.

Read before the Society for Vascular Surgery, Los Angeles, June 23, 1978.

Reprint requests to Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH 45220 (Dr Cranley).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Angiographic and Duplex Scanning Assessment of Biografts in Femorodistal Reconstructions
Huk et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1989;23:138-142.
ABSTRACT  

Modified Human Umbilical Vein Arteriovenous Fistula for Maintenance Hemodialysis: A 31/2-Year Experience
Rubio and Farrell
Arch Surg 1982;117:943-945.
ABSTRACT  

Intimal Breakdown Causing Failure of Human Umbilical Vein Graft
Haun et al.
Arch Surg 1981;116:230-231.
ABSTRACT  

Reconstructive Surgery for Combined Aortofemoral and Infrafemoral Occlusion
Nakata
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1980;14:403-408.
ABSTRACT  

Human Umbilical Cord Vein for Peripheral Arterial Reconstructive Surgery
Raithel
ANGIOLOGY 1980;31:533-537.
 

Technical Requirements for a Successful Human Umbilical Vein Implant
Drezner and Turner
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1980;14:158-167.
 

Maintenance Hemodialysis With Modified Human Umbilical Vein Graft Angioaccess
Rubio and Farrell
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1980;14:186-191.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.