You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 7, July 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  SYMPOSIUM ON THE OPERATING ROOM ENVIRONMENT
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Wound Infections in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

Ultraviolet Light for the Control of Airborne Bacteria

Mary Moggio, MSPH; J. Leonard Goldner, MD; Donald E. McCollum, MD; Stephen F. Beissinger, MD

Arch Surg. 1979;114(7):815-823.


Abstract

• Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation (1,537 A) during total hip arthroplasty will effectively reduce risk of airborne bacterial contamination of the operative field. An air sampling study at the operative site compared 28 total hip arthroplasties with UV lights on and 19 operations with UV lights off. The use of UV irradiation significantly reduced the average number of airborne bacteria over the operative site, although the results indicate that the number of airborne bacteria collected at the operative site in each conventional operating room without UV irradiation was quite low. Data confirmed the fact that airborne bacteria are a reflection of operating room personnel and their activities. With UV light, the rate of infection from possible airborne sources was 0.15% for 1,322 total hip patients. Thus, emphasis is now placed on those causes of infection that are not airborne.

(Arch Surg 114:815-823, 1979)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 2, 1978.

Reprint requests to Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710 (Dr Goldner).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Ultraviolet Lighting During Orthopaedic Surgery and the Rate of Infection
Ritter et al.
JBJS 2007;89:1935-1940.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevention of Perioperative Infection
Fletcher et al.
JBJS 2007;89:1605-1618.
FULL TEXT  

Incidence and Short-Term Outcomes of Primary and Revision Hip Replacement in the United States
Zhan et al.
JBJS 2007;89:526-533.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Total elbow arthroplasty with the Coonrad/Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis: A 10- TO 31-YEAR SURVIVAL ANALYSIS
Aldridge et al.
J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88-B:509-514.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Aseptic Transgressions Among Surgeons and Anesthesiologists: A Quantitative Study
Crow and Greene
Arch Surg 1982;117:1012-1016.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.