You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 7, July 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (78)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Diagnostic Errors With Peritoneal Lavage in Patients With Pelvic Fractures

Steve G. Hubbard, MD; Brack A. Bivins, MD; Charles R. Sachatello, MD; Ward O. Griffen, Jr, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1979;114(7):844-846.


Abstract

• Diagnostic peritoneal lavage, considered to be a highly accurate technique for detecting intraperitoneal blood in the trauma patient, may be less reliable in the presence of a pelvic fracture. In a retrospective review of 222 patients with pelvic fractures, 61 patients were found who had had a diagnostic peritoneal lavage performed as part of the initial evaluation of their condition. Twenty-six of these patients had had a negative lavage result. There had been no false-negative results in this group, although six patients required operations for extraperitoneal injuries. Of the 35 patients with a positive lavage result, 10 (29%) were found to have false-positive lavage results with no intraperitoneal source of bleeding. The only deaths in this series occurred in the group requiring operations, eight of 41 (20%). Four of the eight deaths were due to uncontrollable bleeding that resulted from exploration of the retroperitoneal hematoma. These data suggest that a negative lavage result is highly reliable in the patient with a pelvic fracture and should allow management with confidence that there is no severe intraperitoneal injury. Positive lavage results, however, must be interpreted with caution.

(Arch Surg 114:844-846, 1979)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY 40506.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Dec 4, 1978.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY 40506 (Dr Bivins).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Role of Laparoscopy in the Acute Abdomen and Trauma
Johnson and Luchette
SURG INNOV 1996;3:168-177.
ABSTRACT  

The Role of Laparoscopy in the Evaluation of Abdominal Trauma
Thal and Rossi
SURG INNOV 1996;3:178-184.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnostic Accuracy of Peritoneal Lavage in Patients With Pelvic Fractures
Mendez et al.
Arch Surg 1994;129:477-482.
ABSTRACT  

Pelvic Fracture Hemorrhage: Priorities in Management
Evers et al.
Arch Surg 1989;124:422-424.
ABSTRACT  

Inaccuracy of Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage in Penetrating Colonic Trauma
Obeid et al.
Arch Surg 1984;119:906-908.
ABSTRACT  

Major Pelvic Fractures
Naam et al.
Arch Surg 1983;118:610-616.
ABSTRACT  

Computed Tomography in Blunt Abdominal Trauma
Federle et al.
Arch Surg 1982;117:645-650.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.