You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 9, September 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  FIFTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NEW ENGLAND SOCIETY FOR VASCULAR SURGERY, DIXVILLE NOTCH, NH, SEPT 29, 1978
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (38)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Predicting Success of Forefoot Amputations in Diabetics by Noninvasive Testing

Gary W. Gibbons, MD; Frank C. Wheelock, Jr, MD; Carl S. Hoar, Jr, MD; John L. Rowbotham, MD; Carol Siembieda, RN

Arch Surg. 1979;114(9):1034-1036.


Abstract

• Sixty-six diabetic patients underwent needed forefoot amputations when clinical assessment indicated a reasonable chance of healing. All patients underwent noninvasive testing consisting of segmental systolic pressure measurements and pulse volume recordings (PVRs) taken at the thigh, calf, ankle, and forefoot levels. Segmental systolic pressures were falsely high (>200 mm Hg) and therefore not useful in 56%. Ankle systolic pressures predicted failure in 36% of patients who healed and success in 64% who failed to heal. Segmental PVRs were sequentially predictive in only 50%. Forefoot PVR traces predicted failure in 50% of patients whose amputations healed. No patient should be denied a forefoot amputation solely on the basis of unfavorable results of noninvasive tests. Favorable clinical signs and a strongly positive forefoot PVR trace are the best predictors of successful forefoot amputations in diabetic patients.

(Arch Surg 114:1034-1036, 1979)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, New England Deaconess Hospital (Drs Gibbons, Wheelock, Hoar, and Rowbotham), and the Joslin Clinic Division of the Joslin Diabetes Foundation, Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 13, 1979.

Read before the fifth annual meeting of the New England Society for Vascular Surgery, Dixville Notch, NH, Sept 28, 1978.

Reprint requests to 110 Francis St, Boston, MA 02215 (Dr Gibbons).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Long-Term Prognosis of Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: A population-based cohort study
Faglia et al.
Diabetes Care 2009;32:822-827.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Radial Artery Use in Bypass Grafting Does Not Change Digital Blood Flow or Hand Function
Dumanian et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1998;65:1284-1287.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Studies on the Survival of Transmetatarsal Amputation Stumps
Friedmann et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1989;23:34-42.
ABSTRACT  

Diabetes And Amputations
Rowbotham
The Diabetes Educator 1983;8:19-22.
 

Prospective Use of Xenon Xe 133 Clearance for Amputation Level Selection
Moore et al.
Arch Surg 1981;116:86-88.
ABSTRACT  

Noninvasive Prediction of Amputation Level in Diabetic Patients
Gibbons et al.
Arch Surg 1979;114:1253-1257.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.