You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 9, September 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  FIFTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NEW ENGLAND SOCIETY FOR VASCULAR SURGERY, DIXVILLE NOTCH, NH, SEPT 29, 1978
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prophylactic Interruption of the Inferior Vena Cava

Immediate and Long-term Hemodynamic Effects

Stephen M. Korwin, MD; Allan D. Callow, MD; David Rosenthal, MD; C. Bruce Ledig, MD; Ralph A. Deterling, Jr, MD; Thomas F. O'Donnell, Jr, MD

Arch Surg. 1979;114(9):1037-1040.


Abstract

• Two hundred patients were evaluated retrospectively to determine the clinical effects of prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) interruption in association with aortic reconstruction. No pulmonary embolism occurred in the group with IVC interruption, but embolisms did occur in seven of 68 patients who had aortic reconstruction performed without IVC interruption. In two patients, the pulmonary embolism was fatal. Postoperative incidence of deep vein thrombosis was 9% in both groups. Clinical and hemodynamic effects of prophylactic IVC interruption were studied in 20 additional patients. Venous hemodynamics (maximum venous outflow, inferior vena cava pressure, and ambulatory venous pressure) showed no change following interruption in 19/20. Sixteen patients from the original group of patients with prophylactic interruption were studied hemodynamically. No pulmonary embolism was clinically evident. One new case of deep vein thrombosis was seen. Again, venous hemodynamics showed no change as a result of IVC interruption. Prophylactic IVC interruption is a safe means of decreasing the incidence of pulmonary embolism without increasing venous-related morbidity.

(Arch Surg 114:1037-1040, 1979)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 17, 1979.

Read before the fifth annual meeting of the New England Society for Vascular Surgery, Dixville Notch, NH, Sept 28, 1978.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Tufts-New England Medical Center, 171 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111 (Dr Callow).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Randomized, Prospective Trial of Deep Venous Thrombosis Prophylaxis in Aortic Surgery
Killewich et al.
Arch Surg 1997;132:499-504.
ABSTRACT  

Prophylactic Interruption of the Inferior Vena Cava: Immediate and Long-Term Results
Rosenthal et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1992;26:480-486.
ABSTRACT  

Deep Venous Thrombophlebitis Following Aortoiliac Reconstructive Surgery
Reilly et al.
Arch Surg 1982;117:1210-1211.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.