You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 1, January 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (49)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Emergent or Elective Operation for Symptomatic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

George Johnson, Jr, MD; Noel B. McDevitt, MD; Herbert J. Proctor, MD; Stanley R. Mandel, MD; Jack B. Peacock, MD

Arch Surg. 1980;115(1):51-53.


Abstract

• The patient with the symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) presents a management dilemma, ie, emergent, urgent, or elective operation. The mortality for 38 patients with a ruptured AAA prior to 1972 was 61%. That year, a policy of immediate operation was instituted for patients with symptoms that might be referable to a ruptured AAA. It is concluded that an immediate operation on the patient with a symptomatic but intact AAA resulted in an excessively high mortality. Thus, the indications for an immediate operation on these patients should be based on clinical judgment; attempting to differentiate between the patient with the ruptured and the patient with the intact aneurysm. Hemodynamic data (blood pressure or hematocrit reading) suggesting a decrease in blood volume dictate an immediate operation. An urgent operation on the well-prepared patient should be performed on all patients with a symptomatic aneurysm in which the clinical and hemodynamic findings do not suggest that it has ruptured.

(Arch Surg 115:51-53, 1980)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular-Trauma-Transplantation Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Aug 27, 1979.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Burnett-Womack Clinical Sciences Building 229H, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (Dr Johnson)



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Management of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Early Surgery vs Watchful Waiting
Katz et al.
JAMA 1992;268:2678-2686.
ABSTRACT  

Surgonomics: The Costs of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Munoz et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1988;39:830-837.
ABSTRACT  

Chronic Contained Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Jones et al.
Arch Surg 1986;121:542-546.
ABSTRACT  

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Elderly Patients
Walker et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1986;20:79-83.
ABSTRACT  

Computed Tomographic Diagnosis of Acute Aortoiliac Catastrophes
Lineaweaver et al.
Arch Surg 1982;117:1095-1097.
ABSTRACT  

The Advantage of Early Operation for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
McCabe et al.
Arch Surg 1981;116:1025-1029.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.