You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 2, February 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Revascularization for Severe Limb Ischemia

Garland D. Perdue, MD; Robert B. Smith, III, MD; Charles R. Veazey, MD; Joseph D. Ansley, MD

Arch Surg. 1980;115(2):168-171.


Abstract

• Patients with rest pain or tissue necrosis (generally correlated with a tibial-brachial pressure index of less than 0.25) have a high probability of limb loss unless revascularization is done. These problems are usually associated with extensive and multiple segments of anatomical occlusive disease. A review of 359 patients with such problems indicates that revascularization was done in 86%, with initial success in 92% of patients. The durability of successful limb preservation proved good, with 90% of patients having a comfortable, useful limb to time of death or for one year or longer after operation. Cumulative patency rates were 90% at five years for aortofemoral reconstructions, 70% at five years for femoropopliteal bypasses, and 49% at five years for femorotibial grafts. Cumulative limb salvage rates were 93%, 81%, and 67% at five years in the same categories, respectively.

(Arch Surg 115:168-171, 1980)



Author Affiliations

From the Joseph Brown Whitehead Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 8, 1979.

Read in part before the International Cardiovascular Society, Tokyo, Sept 1, 1977.

Reprint requests to 1365 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 (Dr Perdue).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Functional Benefits of Peripheral Vascular Bypass Surgery for Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Regensteiner et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1993;27:437-446.
ABSTRACT  

Functional Benefits of Peripheral Vascular Bypass Surgery for Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Regensteiner et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1993;27:369-378.
ABSTRACT  

Variation in Utilization of Procedures for Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Look at Patient Characteristics
Tunis et al.
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:991-998.
ABSTRACT  

Functional Benefits of Peripheral Vascular Bypass Surgery for Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Regensteiner et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1993;44:1-10.
ABSTRACT  

Improved Results With Diabetic Below-Knee Amputations
Fearon et al.
Arch Surg 1985;120:777-780.
ABSTRACT  

Progress in the Management of Peripheral Vascular Disease
Blau and Kerstein
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1982;16:172-184.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.