You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 4, April 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE EIGHTY-SEVENTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, COLORADO SPRINGS, COLO, NOV 11-14, 1979
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (40)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Peritoneal Lavage

Its Unreliability in Gunshot Wounds of the Lower Chest and Abdomen

Erwin R. Thal, MD; Robert A. May, MD; David Beesinger, MD

Arch Surg. 1980;115(4):430-433.


Abstract

• The accuracy of peritoneal lavage in patients with gunshot wounds has not been previously reported. A prospective study comprised of 168 patients was designed to determine the reliability of physical examination and peritoneal lavage. Patients sustaining gunshot wounds to the lower chest and abdomen underwent clinical assessment followed up by lavage prior to operation. There was 20.2% false-negative and 15.9% false-positive physical examination results. Of the patients, 25.4% with a negative lavage result had a positive celiotomy. Six of 15 patients with false-negative lavage results had RBC counts less than 1,000/cu mm. Gunshot wounds differ from stab wounds because of the unpredictable trajectory, blast effect, and high likelihood of visceral injury. It can be concluded from this study that because of the inconsistent results of both lavage and physical examination, patients who sustain gunshot wounds are best treated by exploratory celiotomy.

(Arch Surg 115:430-433, 1980)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Dec 3, 1979.

Read before the 87th annual meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Colorado Springs, Colo, Nov 13, 1979.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Southwestern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75235.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The early management of gunshot wounds Part II: the abdomen, extremities and special situations
Whitfield and Garner
Trauma 2007;9:47-71.
ABSTRACT  

Current technology: laparoscopic surgery in trauma
Brooks and Boffard
Trauma 1999;1:53-60.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluation of Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage in Stable Patients With Gunshot Wounds to the Abdomen
Kelemen et al.
Arch Surg 1997;132:909-913.
ABSTRACT  

Selective Nonoperative Management of Gunshot Wounds of the Anterior Abdomen
Demetriades et al.
Arch Surg 1997;132:178-183.
ABSTRACT  

Penetrating Abdominal Wounds: Rationale for Exploratory Laparotomy
Moore and Marx
JAMA 1985;253:2705-2708.
ABSTRACT  

Inaccuracy of Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage in Penetrating Colonic Trauma
Obeid et al.
Arch Surg 1984;119:906-908.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.