You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 4, April 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE EIGHTY-SEVENTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, COLORADO SPRINGS, COLO, NOV 11-14, 1979
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (22)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Healing of the Perineal Wound

Renee S. Hartz, MD; Stuart M. Poticha, MD; Thomas W. Shields, MD

Arch Surg. 1980;115(4):471-474.


Abstract

• The operative management of the perineal wound of 100 consecutive patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection or total proctocolectomy was readily divided into four categories: (1) left open with simple packing, (2) closed primarily with simple drainage (Penrose or red rubber), (3) closed primarily with suction drainage (airtight and watertight), or (4) closed primarily with suction drainage plus continuous irrigation. At three weeks, none of the open wounds, 11% of those closed with simple drainage, 48% closed with suction, and 60% of those closed with suction plus irrigation were healed. By three months, the cumulative figures were 20%, 44%, 88%, and 87%, respectively, and at one year, 92%, 77%, 95%, and 97%. No difference was found between the wounds closed with suction and those closed with suction plus irrigation. There was a highly significant difference in the rate of wound healing when the wounds closed with suction alone or with irrigation were compared with those left open or closed with simple drainage. At three months, the former wounds were healed in 88% of the patients, and the latter in only 30%. The method of choice of management of the perineal wound appears to be that of primary closure with immediate suction drainage with or without concomitant irrigation.

(Arch Surg 115:471-474, 1980)



Author Affiliations

From the Surgical Service, Veterans Administration Lakeside Medical Center, Chicago.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Dec 14, 1979.

Read before the 87th annual meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Colorado Springs, Colo, Nov 13, 1979.

Reprint requests to Surgical Service, Veterans Administration Lakeside Medical Center, 333 E Huron St, Chicago, IL 60611 (Dr Shields).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.