You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 6, June 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (22)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Femoropopliteal Bypass Grafting for Intermittent Claudication

Is Pessimism Warranted?

Magruder C. Donaldson, MD; John A. Mannick, MD

Arch Surg. 1980;115(6):724-727.


Abstract

• From 1965 to 1979, 43 consecutive patients underwent 51 femoropopliteal reconstructions to relieve disabling claudication. This represented 17% of 298 femoropopliteal and femorotibial reconstructions performed by the same surgical team during this period of time. All patients operated on for claudication experienced relief of symptoms after surgery. There was no operative mortality and there was only one case of immediate graft failure. Cumulative graft patency was 93% at two years and 88% at five years by life table analysis. One patient who underwent below-knee amputation 12 years after his initial femoropopliteal graft was the only patient who lost a limb at any time during the follow-up period. On the basis of this experience, we now offer femoropopliteal grafting to any active individual who is disabled by intermittent claudication on the basis of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease.

(Arch Surg 115:724-727, 1980)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School and the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Division of the Affiliated Hospitals Center Inc, Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 12, 1979.

Reprint requests to 721 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (Dr Mannick).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Functional Benefits of Peripheral Vascular Bypass Surgery for Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Regensteiner et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1993;27:437-446.
ABSTRACT  

Functional Benefits of Peripheral Vascular Bypass Surgery for Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Regensteiner et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1993;27:369-378.
ABSTRACT  

Functional Benefits of Peripheral Vascular Bypass Surgery for Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Regensteiner et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1993;44:1-10.
ABSTRACT  

Femoropopliteal Reconstruction for Claudication: The Risk to Life and Limb
Kent et al.
Arch Surg 1988;123:1196-1198.
ABSTRACT  

A Review of Structural and Material Properties of Vascular Grafts
Pourdeyhimi and Text
J Biomater Appl 1987;2:163-204.
ABSTRACT  

Polytetrafluoroethylene Grafts as the First-Choice Arterial Substitute in Femoropopliteal Revascularization
Quinones-Baldrich et al.
Arch Surg 1984;119:1238-1243.
ABSTRACT  

Progress in the Management of Peripheral Vascular Disease
Blau and Kerstein
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1982;16:172-184.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.