You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 9, September 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIF, JAN 20, 1980
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Ultrasonography and Oral Cholecystography

A Comparison of Their Use in the Diagnosis of Gallbladder Disease

Richard P. Detwiler, MD; Daniel S. Kim, MD; Jerrold K. Longerbeam, MD

Arch Surg. 1980;115(9):1096-1098.


Abstract

• The charts of all cholecystectomy patients at the White Memorial Medical Center, Los Angeles, from January 1977 to December 1979 were reviewed; of 374 patients, 76 had had both abdominal ultrasound scan and oral cholecystography performed preoperatively. Cholecystography accurately diagnosed gallbladder disease in 71 of these 76 patients, an accuracy rate of 93.4%, with one false-positive and four false-negative results. Ultrasonography correctly predicted gallbladder disease in 66 of 76 patients, an accuracy rate of 86.8%, with one false-positive and nine false-negative results. On the basis of this study and others in the literature, ultrasound scanning is recommended as the initial screening diagnostic study for gallbladder disease. Oral cholecystography should follow in patients in whom ultrasonography fails to identify gallbladder calculi.

(Arch Surg 115:1096-1098, 1980)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Detwiler and Longerbeam) and Radiology (Dr Kim), White Memorial Medical Center, Los Angeles; and the Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, Calif (Dr Longerbeam).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 7, 1980.

Read before the annual meeting of the Southern California Chapter of the American College of Surgeons, Rancho Mirage, Calif, Jan 20, 1980.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, White Memorial Medical Center, 1720 Brooklyn Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90033 (Dr Longerbeam).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analyses in the Medical Literature: Are the Methods Being Used Correctly?
Udvarhelyi et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1992;116:238-244.
ABSTRACT  

How to Image the Gallbladder in Suspected Cholecystitis
Marton and Doubilet
ANN INTERN MED 1988;109:722-729.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.