 |
 |

Aortic Grafting ProceduresTailoring the Options
Milton L. Owens, MD, FACS;
Samuel Eric Wilson, MD, FACS;
Irving Schwartz, MD
Arch Surg. 1980;115(9):1099-1102.
Abstract
Records from 165 patients who had received aortoiliac or aortofemoral bypass grafts were reviewed. The overall five-year patency rate was 88%. There was no significant difference in operative duration, amount of blood transfused, postoperative complications, and life table patency rates when comparisons were made of unilateral and bilateral grafts, of patients who underwent sympathectomy and those who did not, or of aortofemoral and aortoiliac grafts. When bypass grafting included an additional procedure, the amount of blood transfused and the number of postoperative complications increased significantly. We conclude that (1) the decision to operate should be based on symptoms, (2) the site of anastomosis should be chosen from anatomic characteristics, and (3) other procedures should not be performed except to achieve obvious therapeutic goals and to assure graft patency.
(Arch Surg 115:1099-1102, 1980)
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Surgery, Vascular Surgery Section, VA Wadsworth Medical Center, Los Angeles.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication May 7, 1980.
Read before the annual meeting of the Southern California Chapter of the American College of Surgeons, Jan 19, 1980, Rancho Mirage, Calif.
Reprint requests to Department of Surgery (691/112K2), VA Wadsworth Medical Center, Wilshire and Sawtelle Boulevards, Los Angeles, CA 90073 (Dr Owens).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Aortic Reconstruction vs Extra-anatomic Bypass and Angioplasty: Thoughts on Evolving a Protocol for Selection
Bunt
Arch Surg 1986;121:1166-1171.
ABSTRACT
Progress in the Management of Peripheral Vascular Disease
Blau and Kerstein
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1982;16:172-184.
ABSTRACT
|