You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 9, September 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIF, JAN 20, 1980
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Aortic Grafting Procedures

Tailoring the Options

Milton L. Owens, MD, FACS; Samuel Eric Wilson, MD, FACS; Irving Schwartz, MD

Arch Surg. 1980;115(9):1099-1102.


Abstract

• Records from 165 patients who had received aortoiliac or aortofemoral bypass grafts were reviewed. The overall five-year patency rate was 88%. There was no significant difference in operative duration, amount of blood transfused, postoperative complications, and life table patency rates when comparisons were made of unilateral and bilateral grafts, of patients who underwent sympathectomy and those who did not, or of aortofemoral and aortoiliac grafts. When bypass grafting included an additional procedure, the amount of blood transfused and the number of postoperative complications increased significantly. We conclude that (1) the decision to operate should be based on symptoms, (2) the site of anastomosis should be chosen from anatomic characteristics, and (3) other procedures should not be performed except to achieve obvious therapeutic goals and to assure graft patency.

(Arch Surg 115:1099-1102, 1980)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Vascular Surgery Section, VA Wadsworth Medical Center, Los Angeles.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 7, 1980.

Read before the annual meeting of the Southern California Chapter of the American College of Surgeons, Jan 19, 1980, Rancho Mirage, Calif.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery (691/112K2), VA Wadsworth Medical Center, Wilshire and Sawtelle Boulevards, Los Angeles, CA 90073 (Dr Owens).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Aortic Reconstruction vs Extra-anatomic Bypass and Angioplasty: Thoughts on Evolving a Protocol for Selection
Bunt
Arch Surg 1986;121:1166-1171.
ABSTRACT  

Progress in the Management of Peripheral Vascular Disease
Blau and Kerstein
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1982;16:172-184.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.