You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 1, January 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  AMPUTATION SYMPOSIUM
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (31)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Rehabilitation for Lower Extremity Amputation

James M. Malone, MD; Wesley Moore, MD; Joseph M. Leal, CP; Sandee J. Childers

Arch Surg. 1981;116(1):93-98.


Abstract

• The results of rehabilitation for lower-extremity amputation were analyzed to assess the impact of a center that used a coordinated team combined with modern surgical and prosthetic techniques. Data for group 1 patients (amputated between July 1, 1975, and June 30, 1977) demonstrated a healing rate of 63%, a mean rehabilitation time of 128 days, a mean hospitalization time of 68 days, and a rehabilitation rate of 69% for those who could walk prior to amputation. Data for group 2 (amputated between July 1, 1977, and July 30, 1979) demonstrated an amputation healing rate of 97%, an average rehabilitation time of 30.8 days, a mean hospitalization time of 38 days, and a rehabilitation rate of 100% for those patients who could walk before amputation. There was no difference between groups 1 and 2 in surgical mortality; all other variables, however, showed significant improvement for group 2 patients. Comparison within the same institution of the results of rehabilitation for lower-extremity amputation before and after the initiation of a dedicated amputation center clearly demonstrated the superiority of the center concept.

(Arch Surg 116:93-98, 1981)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 15, 1980.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ 85724 (Dr Malone).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Foot Infections in Diabetic Patients: Decision and Cost-effectiveness Analyses
Eckman et al.
JAMA 1995;273:712-720.
ABSTRACT  

Limb Salvage Despite Extensive Tissue Loss: Free Tissue Transfer Combined With Distal Revascularization
Cronenwett et al.
Arch Surg 1989;124:609-615.
ABSTRACT  

Improved Results With Diabetic Below-Knee Amputations
Fearon et al.
Arch Surg 1985;120:777-780.
ABSTRACT  

Guillotine Amputation in the Treatment of Nonsalvageable Lower-Extremity Infections
McIntyre et al.
Arch Surg 1984;119:450-453.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.