You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 12, December 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Blood potassium cardioplegia administration. Comparison of myocardial protection offered by three techniques

F. P. Catinella, J. N. Cunningham Jr, R. K. Srungaram, I. M. Nathan, E. A. Knopp, G. Paone, F. G. Baumann, P. X. Adams and F. C. Spencer

To investigate the best method of administration of blood potassium cardioplegia, 19 dogs were studied while undergoing 120 minutes each of aortic crossclamping (myocardial temperature, less than 15 degrees C). Group 1 (six dogs) underwent a single 120-minute period of aortic crossclamping with the heart protected by multiple reinjections (1,000 mL every 30 minutes) of blood potassium cardioplegia solution (potassium chloride, 30 mEq/L; pH, 8; temperature, less than 15 degrees C). Group 2 (six dogs) underwent four separate 30-minute periods of aortic crossclamping, but allowing hearts to beat in a nonworking state for 20 minutes at 35 degrees C between each arrest interval. Hearts in group 3 (seven dogs) were initially arrested as described above, following which a continuous infusion (75 mL/min; KCl, 10 mEq/L) of blood potassium cardioplegia solution was maintained throughout the arrest period. Measurements of myocardial metabolism, ventricular function, regional blood flow, and ultrastructure were carried out before arrest and 30 minutes after final unclamping. Analysis of the data revealed no significant benefit of one method over another, with the exception that adenosine triphosphate level was least preserved with intermittent unclamping and reperfusion. Because continuous perfusion techniques are more cumbersome than multidose reinjection, and intermittent aortic crossclamping lengthens total cardiopulmonary bypass time, we favor the simplest approach, multidose reinjection during a single uninterrupted period of aortic crossclamping.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.