You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 2, February 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (33)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Symptoms, Stenosis, and Bruit

Interrelationships in Carotid Artery Disease

Thomas S. Riles, MD; Abraham Lieberman, MD; Igor Kopelman, MD; Anthony M. Imparato, MD

Arch Surg. 1981;116(2):218-220.


Abstract

• The relationship between focal neurologic symptoms, carotid artery stenosis, and cervical bruits was studied in 495 patients. Among the 990 carotid arteries, 562 (57%) were considered to be symptomatic and 505 (51%) were associated with bruit. There was a linear relationship between the degree of stenosis and symptoms. Of the highly stenotic vessels (80% to 99% narrowing), 253 of 350 (72%) were symptomatic; 85 of 104 (82%) occluded vessels were symptomatic. There was a linear relationship between the occurrence of cervical bruit and degree of stenosis, up to but not including total occlusion. The relationship between bruits and focal neurologic symptoms was less direct. Among 562 symptomatic arteries, 297 (53%) had a bruit and 265 (47%) did not. In symptomatic patients, the absence of a cervical bruit should not delay a workup for extracranial vascular disease.

(Arch Surg 116:218-220, 1981)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Riles, Kopelman, and Imparato) and Neurology (Dr Lieberman), New York University, New York.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept 8, 1980.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, New York University, 530 First Ave, New York, NY 10016 (Dr Riles).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Role of the Distal Balloon Protection Technique in the Prevention of Cerebral Embolic Events During Carotid Stent Placement
Martin et al.
Stroke 2001;32:479-484.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Performance of Carotid Ultrasound in Evaluating Candidates for Carotid Endarterectomy Is Optimized by an Approach Based on Clinical Outcome Rather Than Accuracy
Wilterdink et al.
Stroke 1996;27:1094-1098.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cervical Bruits: Clinical Correlates of Stenosis
Goldman et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1991;42:491-497.
ABSTRACT  

Predictive Value of Carotid Bruit for Carotid Atherosclerosis
Ingall et al.
Arch Neurol 1989;46:418-422.
ABSTRACT  

Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Current Diagnosis and Management
Hobson
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1988;1:141-154.
 

Symptoms and Signs of Carotid Territory Transient Cerebral Ischaemia
Murie et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1986;20:20-26.
ABSTRACT  

Asymptomatic Carotid Bruit: Stenosis or Ulceration, a Conservative Approach
Yatsu and Fields
Arch Neurol 1985;42:383-385.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.