You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 3, March 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Open and percutaneous paracentesis and lavage for abdominal trauma: a randomized prospective study

H. L. Pachter and S. R. Hofstetter

To compare the accuracy and safety of open abdominal paracentesis and lavage vs percutaneous paracentesis and lavage, 210 consecutive patients were prospectively randomized into two groups of 105 each. There were no false-negative diagnoses in either group. The accuracy rate for the open method was 98.1%, and 91.4% for the percutaneous method. Six major complications were encountered with the percutaneous method, for a complication rate of 5.7% compared with no major complications with the open method. The results suggest that the open technique is superior to the percutaneous method.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.