You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 5, May 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE EIGHTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, SALT LAKE CITY, NOV 17-19, 1980
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Simple Closure of Perforated Peptic Ulcer

Still an Effective Procedure for Patients With Delay in Treatment

Kenneth R. Sirinek, MD, PhD; Barry A. Levine, MD; Wayne H. S chwesinger, MD; J. Bradley Aust, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1981;116(5):591-596.


Abstract

• Sixty patients (mean age, 50 years) underwent simple closure of a perforated peptic ulcer. For 56 patients, average delay in treatment was 21.6 hours. Postoperatively, 21 patients (treatment delay, 30 hours) had either pulmonary or abdominal complications. Ten patients (treatment delay, 34 hours) died. Acute onset of ulcer symptoms prior to perforation was associated with a threefold increase in mortality compared with patients with chronic symptoms. Seven patients subsequently underwent vagotomy and partial gastrectomy without complications. This study demonstrates that in patients with peptic ulcer disease, perforation is an unusually frequent indication for operation; advanced age, treatment delay of 30 hours or more, and acute ulcer symptoms are associated with increased morbidity and mortality; and simple closure of the perforation remains an effective procedure in patients who have delayed seeking treatment.

(Arch Surg 1981;116:591-596)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Dec 23, 1980.

Read before the 88th annual meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Salt Lake City, Nov 18, 1980.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78284 (Dr Sirinek).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Perforated Gastric Ulcers: A Plea for Management by Simple Closures
Turner et al.
Arch Surg 1988;123:960-964.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.