You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 5, May 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE EIGHTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, SALT LAKE CITY, NOV 17-19, 1980
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Its Use in the Evaluation of Nonjaundiced Patients With the Postcholecystectomy Syndrome

Marc Cooperman, MD; John J. Ferrara, MD; Larry C. Carey, MD; F. B. Thomas, MD; Edward W. Martin, Jr, MD; John J. Fromkes, MD

Arch Surg. 1981;116(5):606-609.


Abstract

• Forty-two patients with the postcholecystectomy syndrome were studied by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Both the biliary ductal system and pancreatic duct were well visualized in all patients. The ERCP was abnormal in 22 patients (52%). Abnormal findings included choledocholithiasis, papillary stenosis, pancreas divisum, pancreatic carcinoma, sclerosing cholangitis, incomplete cholecystectomy, and chronic pancreatitis. The results of one or more standard liver function tests and/or other noninvasive tests were abnormal in 36 patients; however, none reliably predicted the presence or specific anatomical type of pancreaticobiliary tract disease. Our data indicate that ERCP is essential in the diagnosis and management of the postcholecystectomy syndrome. The high yield of abnormal findings amenable to surgical correction in patients with recurrent biliary tract symptoms following cholecystectomy justifies the use of this procedure in all such patients.

(Arch Surg 1981;116:606-609)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 5, 1981.

Read before the 88th annual meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Salt Lake City, Nov 18, 1980.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Ohio State University College of Medicine, 410 W Tenth Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 (Dr Cooperman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.