You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 5, May 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Selective management of penetrating neck trauma. Cost implications

R. M. Merion, J. K. Harness, S. R. Ramsburgh and N. W. Thompson

Many authors advocate mandatory surgical exploration for all patients with penetrating neck trauma, while other maintain that with careful diagnostic evaluation some patients safely can be spared an operation. From our hospitals, 65 cases of penetrating neck trauma were reviewed, 27 of which showed no mortality without operation. Surgical exploration of the neck showing no injury added $1,930 to the cost of hospitalization. Review of the surgical literature discloses that mortalities reported by authors advocating selective and mandatory exploration are similar. The incidence of missed significant injury is low among patients observed selectively. A management algorithm for the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of patients with penetrating neck trauma is advocated. All stable patients should undergo four-vessel angiography. Studies of the cervical esophagus may be performed. Patients with entirely normal diagnostic evaluations may be observed safely, sparing unnecesary operation.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.