You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 5, May 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE EIGHTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, SALT LAKE CITY, NOV 17-19, 1980
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Femorotibial Bypass Grafts With Sequential Technique

Clinical Results

Fredric Jarrett, MD; Herbert A. Berkoff, MD; Andrew B. Crummy, MD; Folkert O. Belzer, MD

Arch Surg. 1981;116(5):709-714.


Abstract

• Twenty-three patients (mean age, 71 years) have undergone femorotibial bypass grafting with a sequential side-to-side popliteal anastomosis since 1975, 96% because of threatened limb loss. Twenty-one grafts were of autogenous saphenous vein and two were composites of prosthesis and vein. Ankle-brachial indices increased from 0.40 ± 0.27 to 0.84 ± 0.36. Intraoperative flow measurements showed a 40% to 75% augmentation in flow with the sequential anastomosis. Patients who required amputation in the early postoperative period because of graft failure failed to show improvement in ankle indices and did not manifest healing of their ischemic ulcerations. Nineteen of 23 limbs (83%) were salvaged by operation. Follow-up ranged from two to 50 months (mean, 23 months). Graft patency calculated by the life-table method was 74% at one year, 68% at two years, and 62% at four years.

(Arch Surg 1981;116:709-714)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Jarrett, Berkoff, and Belzer) and Radiology (Dr Crummy), University of Wisconsin Clinical Science Center, Madison.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Dec 23, 1980.

Read before the 88th annual meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Salt Lake City, Nov 19, 1980.

Reprint requests to 3471 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15217 (Dr Jarrett).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Isolated Popliteal Segment v Tibial Bypass: Comparison of Hemodynamic and Clinical Results
Brewster et al.
Arch Surg 1984;119:775-779.
ABSTRACT  

Sequential Femoropopliteal and Femorotibial Bypasses: A Ten-Year Follow-up Study
Rosenfeld et al.
Arch Surg 1981;116:1538-1543.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.